Login for Free Services

Essay 21:

Topic: Do you think will have been replaced by by the end of the 21stcentury?

Essayist: Lobat

Nowadays, E-books are a favorite method to study.Although they are common especially in young generations ,personally,I believe that ordinary books will stay as a typical way to study for many years because of (them benefits/)several benefits of them.

Firstly,some people specially old generations used to read handy books.They have been able to carry them wherever they want , read them whenever they want ,also books have easy accessible.In spite of accessibility,carrying books are safer compare with electronic devices for reading E-books.Since seniors might be weak,E-books may be a threaten to them and might be stolen by thieves.

Secondly,from an social viewpoint,ordinary books seems as a traditional way and many people stay faithfully with traditional manners.Furthermore,many people are reluctant to use technical devices or some of them are deprived of having access to expensive high-tech tools.

In conclusion,due to the reasons mentioned above,I would like argue that typically books might be stayed by the countless people such as old ones ,librarians and so on for many reasons like safety,loyalty and profits.
Finally,there are several jobs that are depend on books.they make money and jobs for several people like shopkeepers,publishers and librarians.It sounds unlikely these numerous jibs have been faded in next century .

Essayist: Hajar

In point of fact, there are reasons to hope that e-books and print books could have a bright future together. To be precise, for all the great things e-books accomplish — convenience, selection, portability, multimedia — there are still some fundamental qualities they will simply never possess. Hence, I think that paper books do not get replaced with e-books because there is different experience that alone warrants their existence.
It would be a lot easier to download books on digital devices but the experience of reading real books is vastly different from e-books that individuals cannot give up them. To illustrate, there is something about holding a book in hand and the act of physically turning a page that cannot be matched with pixels on a screen. Furthermore, people have the visual memory of where something was on the page in print books that makes no sense on a screen. Also, people are more likely to re-read when they have a book in their library. To elucidate, when people see their favorite book in shelf, they recall their experiences and concepts of reading real book. While, digital versions do not seem to impart connections so deep. Lets say, books are collectible because of physical and concept beauty. Thats why, “Having a hardcover on my shelf is like having a print by one of my favorite artists on the wall.” One says.
Beyond a doubt, once people start buying digital books, they do not necessarily stop buying printed ones because the two forms seem to serve different purposes. For example, Screen reading seems particularly well-suited to the entertainments such as genre novels and romances because people read them quickly and have no desire to hang onto them after they have turned the last page.
Finally, according these reasons, print books do not have to disappear for e-books to flourish and e-books do not be the only choice. (314)

Leave your questions or comments below.

Please Login to comment
Notify of

Login and join this discussion.

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Sasan 19 hours, 15 minutes ago.

  • Author
  • #40593

    Dr. Hariri

    Would you rather be happy yet slow-witted and unimaginative, or unhappy yet bright and creative? For instance, would you rather live the life of a brilliant yet tortured artist, such as Vincent van Gogh, or that of a happy but carefree soul who is a bit simple-minded?

  • #40672


    I prefer to challenge this question at first and bring up my viewpoint next.
    There are different successful people in the world who reached the apex through different procedures. Although some have faced torture to reach their goals, it does not mean we have to necessarily lose something in our life to climb the ladder of success. Anyway, I suppose the most enjoyable part of life is making progress and relying on your abilities to flourish and thrive. So, I personally go for intelligence and innovation rather than happiness along with naivety. Many people have lived an ordinary life so far and repeating this story can never excite me at all. We need to gain new adventurous experiences and foster our abilities so as to break out of comfort zone.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Close Menu