Learning-centered Method in Second Language Learning

Learning-centered method in second language learning, which is one of the three dimensions of ‘language teaching methods’.

Learning-centered method

Master Languages Online: Untethered Hybrid Learning through Online Classes and Asynchronous Learning

Learning-centered methods are those that are principally concerned with cognitive processes of language learning. These methods such as the Natural Approach seek to provide opportunities for learners to participate in open-ended meaningful interaction through problem-solving tasks in class, assuming that a preoccupation with meaning-making will ultimately lead to target language mastery and that the learners can deploy the still-developing interlanguage to achieve linguistic as well as pragmatic knowledge/ability (Kumaravadivelu, 2006).

LELB Society Methodology for English and Persian students in our bilingual academy
LELB Society Methodology for English and Persian Students

Unlike the other two language teaching methods, in learning-centered method, language development is more incidental than intentional. That is, grammar construction can take place when the learners pay attention to the process of meaning-making even if they are not explicitly focused on the formal properties of the language.

Using body language in teaching English as a second language for more productivity

According to learning-centered pedagogists, language development is a nonlinear process, and therefore, does not require preselected, presequenced systematic language input but requires the creation of conditions in which learners engage in meaningful activities in class. They believe that a language is best learned when the focus is not on the language, that is, when the learner’s attention is focused on understanding, saying, and doing something with language and not when their attention is focused explicitly on linguistic features (Kumaravadivelu, 2006).

Learning-centered pedagogists seek to fill, what Long (1983) called a “psycholinguistic vacuum”. That is, they claim to derive insights from psycholinguistic research on language development in an attempt to incorporate them in language teaching methods.

References

  1. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  2. Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.126

Leave a Comment