Login for Free Services

Learner-centered Method | TESL Issues

Learner-centered Method

Learner-centered method is principally concerned with learner needs, wants, and situations. These methods such as Communicative Language Teaching seek to provide opportunities for learners to practice preselected, presequenced linguistic structures and communicative notions/functions through meaning-focused activities, assuming that a preoccupation with form and function will ultimately lead to target language mastery and that the learners can make use of both formal and functional repertoire to fulfill their communicative needs outside the class (, 2006). In both learner-centered and language-centered methods, language development is more intentional than incidental.

Learner-centered pedagogists aim at making language learners grammatically accurate and communicatively fluent. They keep in mind that learner’s real-life language use in social interaction or for academic study, and present linguistic structures in communicative contexts.

Learner-centered methods are linear and additive. Proponents of learner-centered methods,, like those of language-centered methods, believe in ‘accumulated entities’ the one major difference is that in the case of language-centered methods, the accumulated entities represent linguistic structures, and in the case of learner-centered methods, they represent structures plus notions and functions. Furthermore, just as language-centered pedagogists believe that the linguistic structures of a language could be sequentially presented and explained, the learner-centered pedagogists also believe that each notional/functional category could be matched with one or more linguistic forms, and sequentially presented and explained to the learner (Kumaravadivelu, 2006).

According to Brown (2007), learner-centered includes: (1) techniques that focus on learners’ needs, styles and goals, (2) techniques that give some control to the students, (3) curricula that include the consultation and input of the students and that do not presuppose objectives in advance, (4) techniques that allow for student creativity and innovation, (5) techniques that enhance a student’s sense of competence and self-worth (p. 52).

Breen and (2000): learner-centered gives some responsibilities and control to the students and make them ready to take control by teaching them some they need to continue learning on their own.

In opposition to .

In this approach, the learner is involved, as far as possible and feasible, in the planning, , and of the curriculum. This involvement is felt to increase the interest and of the learners. It is also felt to be a particularly effective way of developing the learners’ learning skills by fostering a reflective attitude towards the learning process.

The students develop more intrinsic motivation.

The students develop a sense of ownership or belongingness to their own classes.

More value is given to ‘performance objectives’ where the learners are prepared to do their best to perform what is expected of them as the result of the instruction.

Learner-centered curriculum, according to (2001), stresses the individual needs of learners, the role of individual experience, and the need to develop , self-reflection, critical thinking, learner strategies and other qualities and skills that are considered to be significant for learners to develop.

Learner-centered Method

Study the complete archive of TESL Issues.

? LELB on Aparat

Leave your questions or comments below.

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Login and join this discussion.

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Sasan 2 days, 20 hours ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #40593

    Dr. Hariri
    Keymaster

    Would you rather be happy yet slow-witted and unimaginative, or unhappy yet bright and creative? For instance, would you rather live the life of a brilliant yet tortured artist, such as Vincent van Gogh, or that of a happy but carefree soul who is a bit simple-minded?

  • #40672

    Sasan
    Participant

    I prefer to challenge this question at first and bring up my viewpoint next.
    There are different successful people in the world who reached the apex through different procedures. Although some have faced torture to reach their goals, it does not mean we have to necessarily lose something in our life to climb the ladder of success. Anyway, I suppose the most enjoyable part of life is making progress and relying on your abilities to flourish and thrive. So, I personally go for intelligence and innovation rather than happiness along with naivety. Many people have lived an ordinary life so far and repeating this story can never excite me at all. We need to gain new adventurous experiences and foster our abilities so as to break out of comfort zone.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Close Menu