- Topic: As public safety is of the highest importance, it is often necessary to test new products on animals. I is better for a few animals to suffer than for human life to be placed at risk by untested products.
- Instructions: Write a report for an educated non-specialist audience for or against the above.
- Essayist: Tareneh
The following essay is about testing new products on animals first, and then using them for humans. It is one of the most controversial topics in the world. There are two sides for this issue; one side believes that it is the exploitation of animals, the other side protects the idea of testing new products to save mankind. I advocate the latter.
Testing new products and drugs on animals has so many effects. First, it can help researchers to find cure and treatments for new illnesses without jeopardizing the valuable lives of people on purpose. Second, it has been advantages to animals, too. For instance, physicians and scientists have found so many cures and vaccines for numerous animals. As a result, the longevity of their life has increased. Last but not least; physicians and scientists cannot control humans as they can in response to animals. Because it is impossible to keep a person in laboratory to just test a suspicious and unfamiliar case on him or her. So, the best solution is animals that are similar to humans.
However, the other group believe that it is unfair to misuse animals in order to test some unnecessary products. They have the right to survive. In addition, humans must not allow themselves to make changes in animals’ life or hurt them. Moreover, this group have brought up the subject of human selfishness for killing the innocent animals for their own advantage.
As a whole, both groups have their own reasons but in my idea it is necessary to victimize some animals’ life in a limited number to save human beings, because we do not have any other alternative. ( 276 words)